Skip to content

Reasonably Available Control Technology

Approval of

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)

State Implementation Plan (SIP)

April 2014 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Analysis and Negative Declaration

On April 10, 2014, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors adopted Resolution #14-08, thereby approving the findings of the 2014 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Analysis, dated April 2014, and the requested submittal of this report as a revision to the SIP; and adopted Resolution #14-09, thereby approving the “Negative Declaration” of "No Sources to Regulate for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) for the polyester resin source category, for which there is Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) CTG", and the submittal of this “Negative Declaration” as a requested revision to the SIP.

April 2014 RACT SIP Analysis Staff Report with Tables

February 2014 RACT SIP Analysis Staff Report with Tables

Resolution 14-01 RACT SIP Analysis (February)

Resolution 14-02 RACT SIP Neg Dec (February)

Resolution 14-08 RACT SIP Analysis (April)

Resolution 14-09 RACT SIP Neg Dec (April)

PM2.5 Implementation

 

 

On August 10, 2006, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors held a Public Hearing to consider public comments regarding the 2006 RACT SIP Update Analysis Report. Resolution #06-09 approves the 2006 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) - State Implementation Plan (SIP) Update Analysis Report and findings. Resolutions 06-10, 06-11, 06-12 and 06-14 are all negative declarations certifying and reaffirming previous findings of “no sources to regulate” on Major Stationary Sources for VOC, non-CTG, and NOX. District Staff conducted an analysis to compare the control measures of existing District rules with current U.S. EPA standards to establish whether or not District rules have been adopted for each standard and where District rules have been adopted, whether each rule’s standards meet the standards. The following documents were presented to the Board for their consideration and/or adoption.

Top